Single Justice Procedure Notice

What is a Single Justice Procedure Notice?

The Single Justice Procedure applies only to cases involving adults charged with summary-only non-imprisonable offences, at present it is primarily used to prosecute motoring offences. The single justice procedure started in April 2015 having been introduced under The Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015.

It will enable relatively minor motoring cases to be dealt with by a single magistrate sitting with a legal adviser considering the police and court papers without the attendance of either a prosecutor or the motorist at Court. Instead the motorist is ‘encouraged’ to engage with the Court and the single justice procedure by making written representations.

Prosecutors and police will identify motoring cases which might be suitable for the single justice procedure. These will be commenced by a written charge and a document called a ‘single justice procedure notice.’ The primary purpose of the single justice procedure is to ensure that straight forward motoring offences are taken from the traditional Court setting and dealt with in a closed court to be determined by a Single Magistrate with no prosecutor or defendant present.

What will be the first notification that the motorist will receive advising them that they face prosecution under the Single Justice Procedure?

A single justice procedure notice will be sent to the motorist by post explaining the offence which has has allegedly occurred – there will be supporting documentation with the single justice procedure notice which will explain the options available to the motorist. The Notice will be accompanied by the evidence upon which the prosecutor will be relying to prove the case, more often than not the police statements which are said to prove the motoring offence.

The notice will give the motorist a date by which to respond in writing to the allegation – rather than giving a date to physically attend court. However, the motorist has the right to request a traditional hearing in open court. For example, if he/she wishes to plead not guilty, or otherwise wants to have a hearing in open court to dispute all or part of the motoring offence.

In cases where a motorist pleads guilty and indicates that he/she would like to have the matter dealt with in his absence (or fails to respond to the notice) a single magistrate will consider the case on the basis of the evidence submitted in writing by the prosecutor, along with any written mitigation from the motorist. The single magistrate can convict and sentence in the absence of the motorist.

The importance therefore in responding to the Single Justice Procedure Notice and making the appropriate written representations can not therefore be over stated. Without written representations from the driver about their case the case will proceed regardless.

If a single magistrate considers at any point that it would be inappropriate to continue with the case under the single justice procedure, the magistrate should then refer the case to a traditional magistrates’ court to be dealt with in the usual way. In this case, the motorist will be advised of the date upon which he/she should attend the Magistrates Court.

In what circumstances should the accused motorist request a hearing in open court?

If you do not accept the allegations or disagree with any of the facts of the motoring offence this should be highlighted within the single justice procedure notice paperwork and the motorist should request a Court hearing.

Moreover, if there is any suggestion that the motorist will be disqualified from driving or is at risk of being banned from driving then an appearance before a traditional court should be requested. This will allow oral representations to be made on the drivers behalf to the Magistrates Court in the usual way.

I have received a Single Justice Procedure Notice in the post for a motoring offence, should I seek legal advice?

Receiving a single justice procedure notice is no different to receiving a summons to attend Court – if there is anything that you are uncertain of, if you dispute any aspect of the motoring offence or if there is any risk that you will be banned from driving you should take legal advice and in any event ensure that you highlight your views within the single justice procedure paperwork.

#1 Motoring Solicitors provide advice to clients facing prosecution for all types of motoring offences that are prosecuted under the Single Justice Procedure. We are able to assist motorists in making written representations to the Court and provide the most appropriate advice in how to respond to the single justice procedure notice. Call us today for an initial telephone consultation to discuss any questions you have about about this relatively new court procedure.

The M4 motorway – variable speed limits around Newport J24 to J28

From today, Monday the 26th September 2016, the variable speed limit surrounding Newport along the M4 will be used to prosecute motorists. It is anticipated that an ‘advisory notice’ will be sent to drivers during the first 14 days and thereafter prosecutions will start for speeding offences. This brief note is designed to help motorists who regularly use this stretch of the M4 through Newport.

The variable speed limits along this part of the M4, are calculated by the amount of traffic between junction 24 for Coldra and junction 28 at Tredegar Park. The speed limit is likely to vary between 40mph and 70 mph. Drivers who use the stretch of road have concerns regarding the new enforcement action. As a result, Go Safe – the partnership that decides who should be prosecuted for exceeding the speed limit – have published answers to some of the most frequently asked questions. Below are some of the answers:

How does the variable speed limit scheme work?

Through this section of motorway, the mandatory speed limit is adjusted according to traffic conditions to keep vehicles moving at a steady rate. Normally during periods of no congestion on an incident-free carriageway, no variable speed limit signs or signals are set and the national speed limit applies. At busy times or in the event of an incident, sensors will detect congestion beginning to build up. The system calculates the optimum speed limit for the current amount of traffic and this is displayed on the electronic signals above lanes or at the side of the road.

Drivers may not be able to see why the signals are set; however, the system is detecting congestion building up and is using the speed limit signals to slow the traffic and keep it moving. Vehicles travel at more constant and similar speeds, making the journey smoother and safer for all. Congestion and queueing is reduced which in turn reduces a key risk of collisions from vehicles approaching the backs of queues. When the traffic flow has subsided and the signs and signals are no longer required, these will return to blank and the carriageway will return to normal motorway operation.

How is speed enforcement carried out in the variable speed limit?

Speed enforcement cameras are fitted onto overhead gantries. The cameras are activated when they detect a vehicle travelling in excess of the speed limit in force at the time.
The system has the necessary Home Office Type Approval (HOTA) which allows its use for enforcement purposes.

Who owns and operates the speed cameras?

Speed enforcement through the use of roadside cameras across Wales is managed and coordinated by GoSafe, a multi-agency partnership comprising all highway authorities within Wales and the four Welsh police forces. Within that partnership structure the Welsh Government owns and installs the cameras located on the M4 Motorway and the police, as the enforcement authority, are responsible for operating them and carrying out enforcement on a day-to-day basis.

What happens if there is a technical fault with the system?

There are built-in safeguards which prevent the camera from activating if there is a technical fault. The system is designed to ensure that it will only capture an offence when the equipment is working correctly. This is a requirement of HOTA.

I do not believe I was travelling in the M4 variable speed limit section at the time stated on my speeding notice sent by the police.

The speed enforcement system includes a calibrated, fully synchronised clock which meets required specific Home Office standards. Enforcement of the speed limit is carried out by the police and the processing of those offences is undertaken by the Central Ticket Office within South Wales Police. Any enquiries about specific speeding offences should be referred to the Central Ticket Office.

The speed limit changed just as I passed under the electronic sign, so I had no time to reduce my speed?

When a mandatory speed limit changes on the overhead signal, there is an automatic delay before enforcement can begin against the newly displayed limit.

Why does the speed limit sometimes change several times over a short stretch of road?

When an incident occurs, control centre operators may set signs and signals to protect the areas affected but the resulting slower-moving traffic can in some cases trigger an automatic setting to prevent queuing. The combination of these two setting modes can cause a combination of speed limits to be set in relation to the incident and the live traffic conditions.

This is normal operation, which ensures that the system protects road users from the effects of both the incident and the traffic congestion. On the westbound carriageway, due to damage sustained during the Brynglas tunnel fire in 2011, reduced lighting is in operation which requires the permanent display of a 50MPH speed limit on the approach and travel through the tunnel.
Works are currently underway at Brynglas tunnels to replace the lighting. These works are mainly taking place overnight to avoid congestion.

As with any prosecution for a speeding or motoring offence, there are various procedures that the police and the prosecution must follow before a fine or penalty points can be imposed.

If you have any legal questions concerning a speeding offence arising from the new variable speed limit imposed along the M4 around Newport or if you at risk of losing your driving licence, call 1 Motoring Solicitors for free initial telephone advice.

Using a mobile whilst driving has reached ‘epidemic proportions’ – is the law about to get tougher?

New research suggests that the number of people who use mobile phones behind the wheel in the UK has quadrupled over the last two years. The survey suggests that drivers have no fear that they will be caught by Police. Read More

Duty of Confidentiality – Doctors and Health Care professionals to the DVLA

It is commonly thought that a Doctor and other healthcare professionals have an unimpeachable and overriding duty of patient confidentiality in every circumstance. However when it comes to a patient’s fitness to drive and reporting to the DVLA this is not the case. Read More

Exceptional Hardship – Are penalty points pointless?

Penalty points are dished out to drivers when they are caught committing motoring offences – anything from speeding or using their phone behind the wheel to driving uninsured. Points usually come with a fine, and there are usually knock-on implications for the price of a driver’s annual car insurance policy in the long run. Read More

Motoring offences to be prosecuted ‘on line’ or in public buildings

Court hearing for motoring offences are to be held  in universities as well as town halls and community centres after ministers announced plans to shut almost one in five Magistartes Courts across the country. Read More

Penalty Points – disqualification and their removal from your driving licence

It is commonly known that when a driver reaches 12 penalty points an automatic disqualification from driving will be imposed by the Court. Many drivers do not appreciate however that for first occasion a driver hits 12 penalty points the automatic driving ban is for a 6 month period. The driver has an opportunity to argue that any disqualification from driving should not be imposed where it will cause ‘exceptional hardship’. Evidence must be called to support an application for exceptional hardship. Read More

How DNA testing can assist in Drink Drive offences.

DNA might not seem an obvious tool to assist in Drink Drive cases; however in two cases it has proved to be decisive.

Case one – Failure to provide.

When an individual fails to provide a breath specimen for analysis the operator of the Evidential Breath Testing Device is instructed on the form MG DD/A (the Drink Drive procedure form) Read More